Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015025›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Assessment of Knowledge of Monkeypox Viral Infection among the General Population in Saudi Arabia.

Najim Z Alshahrani, Faris Alzahrani, Abdullah M Alarifi, Mohammed R Algethami, Maathir Naser Alhumam, Hatim Abdullah Mohammed Ayied, Ahmed Zuhier Awan, Abdullah Faisal Almutairi, Saeed Abdullah Bamakhrama, Budur Saad Almushari and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low income and health literacy: a systematic scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Najim Z AlshahraniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-004X
Faris AlzahraniDepartment of Public Health, General Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Ministry of Health, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M AlarifiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 13323, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed R AlgethamiPreventive Medicine and Public Health Resident, Ministry of Health, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Maathir Naser AlhumamCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Alahsa 36363, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7706-821X
Hatim Abdullah Mohammed AyiedCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Zuhier AwanFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1114-9244
Abdullah Faisal AlmutairiKhaitan Primary Healthcare Center, Khaitan 83001, Kuwait.
Saeed Abdullah BamakhramaFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Budur Saad AlmushariDepartment of Family Medicine, General Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Ministry of Health, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Ranjit SahDepartment of microbiology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-8714
King Abdulaziz University · SAMinistry of Health · SAHarvard University · USKing Faisal University · SAKing Khalid University · SASaudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · SASaudi Electronic University · SAUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox is re-emerging and spreading over the world, posing a serious threat to human life, especially in non-endemic countries, including Saudi Arabia. Due to the paucity of research on knowledge about monkeypox in Saudi Arabia, this study aimed to evaluate the general population’s knowledge of monkeypox in a sample of the country. A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from 25 May 2022 to 15 July 2022. Participants’ knowledge about monkeypox on a 23-item scale and socio-demographic characteristics were gathered in the survey. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare knowledge level (categorized into high and low) and explanatory variables. Out of 480, only 48% of the respondents had high knowledge (mean score > 14). Participants’ age, marital status, residential region, living in the urban area, education level, employment status, being a healthcare worker, income, and smoking status were significantly associated with the level of knowledge about monkeypox (p < 0.01). Overall, social media (75.0%) was the most frequently reported source from where participants obtained monkeypox-related information followed by TV and radio (45.6%), family or friend (15.6%), and healthcare provider (13.8%). We found that overall knowledge of monkeypox infection was slightly poor among the Saudi population. These findings highlight the urgent need for public education on monkeypox to promote awareness and engage the public ahead of the outbreak.

Indexed as

knowledgemonkeypoxmonkeypox virusoutbreakpublic knowledgeSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID36015025
PMCPMC9414752
OpenAlexW4291017424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.