Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014905›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Potential of Egg as Complementary Food to Improve Nutrient Intake and Dietary Diversity.

Mieke Faber, Linda Malan, Herculina S Kruger, Hannah Asare, Marina Visser, Tshiphiri Mukwevho, Cristian Ricci, Cornelius M Smuts

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Daily egg intake may reduce sensitisation to common allergenic foods among six- to nine-month-old south African infants: A randomized controlled trial.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mieke FaberNon-Communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-254X
Linda MalanCentre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.
Herculina S KrugerCentre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-1777
Hannah AsareCentre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-503X
Marina VisserCentre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.
Tshiphiri MukwevhoCentre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.
Cristian RicciAfrica Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.
Cornelius M SmutsCentre of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), North-West University, Potchefstroom 2530, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-0054
North-West University · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

DG Murray Trust NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The original aim was to determine the effect of egg consumption on infant growth in a low socioeconomic community in South Africa in a randomized controlled trial. Enrolment was, however, prematurely stopped due to COVID-19 lockdown regulations. The resultant small sample (egg group n = 70; control group n = 85) was followed up to assess the feasibility of egg consumption for eight months in terms of dietary intake, egg usage and perceived effects of lockdown on child feeding. Egg consumption remained low in the control group, <10% consumed egg ≥4 days/week at the follow-up points. In the egg group, egg was frequently consumed at midpoint (daily 87.1%, 4−6 days 8.1%) and endpoint (daily 53.1%, 4−6 days 21.9%). At endpoint, dietary intake of cholesterol and vitamin D was higher, and intake of niacin and vitamin B6 lower in the egg group compared to the control group. Dietary diversity was low, 36.2% of the egg group and 18.9% of the control group (p < 0.05) achieved minimum dietary diversity at endpoint. No babies developed egg allergy or sensitization, and adjusted regression analysis showed that frequency of egg intake was not related with the incidence or duration of allergy-related symptoms. This study showed that frequent egg consumption can contribute safely to complementary food for babies, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildCommunicable Disease ControlDietEatingEnergy IntakeHumansInfantdietary diversitydietary intakeegg allergyegg consumptioninfants

Identifiers

PMID36014905
PMCPMC9416406
OpenAlexW4293515375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.