Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014780›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Diet-Derived Circulating Antioxidants and Risk of Digestive System Tumors: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Linlin Yin, Haihao Yan, Kangdi Chen, Zuhong Ji, Xiuhua Zhang, Guozhong Ji, Bin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phytochemicals in Cancer Chemoprevention: Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linlin YinDepartment of Digestive Diseases, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Haihao YanMedical Center for Digestive Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Kangdi ChenMedical Center for Digestive Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Zuhong JiMedical Center for Digestive Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Xiuhua ZhangMedical Center for Digestive Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Guozhong JiMedical Center for Digestive Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Digestive Diseases, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous observational case-control studies have shown significant controversy over the impact of dietary intake-related circulating antioxidants on the risk of digestive system tumors. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomized (MR) analysis to determine whether there was a significant causal relationship between increased levels of circulating antioxidants and digestive system tumors. Our circulating antioxidants (vitamin C, carotenoids, vitamin A, and vitamin E) were derived from absolute circulating antioxidants and circulating antioxidant metabolites, and their corresponding instrumental variables were screened from published studies. The digestive system tumors we studied included colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, liver, and esophageal cancer, and the corresponding summary GAWS (genome-wide association study) data were obtained from the UK Biobank database. We first evaluated the causal relationship between each tumor and circulating antioxidants and then used meta-analysis to summarize the results of MR analysis of different tumors. No significant associations were noted for genetically predicted circulating antioxidants and higher risk of digestive system tumors in our study. The pooled ORs (odds ratio) are 0.72 (95% CI: 0.46-1.11; β-carotene), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.08; lycopene), 2.12 (95% CI: 0.31-14.66; retinol), and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.02; ascorbate) for absolute circulating antioxidants; for circulating antioxidant metabolites, the pooled ORs for digestive system tumors risk per unit increase of antioxidants were 1.29 (95% CI: 0.39-4.28; α-tocopherol), 1.72 (95% CI: 0.85-3.49; γ-tocopherol), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.96-1.14; retinol), and 1.21 (95% CI: 0.97-1.51; ascorbate), respectively. Our study suggested that increased levels of dietary-derived circulating antioxidants did not reduce the risk of digestive system tumors.

Indexed as

Digestive System NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidDietGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisRisk FactorsVitamin AAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidVitamin Acirculating antioxidantsdigestive system tumorsmendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID36014780
PMCPMC9413447
OpenAlexW4291017078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.