ArticleMicromachines2022
Structural Design and Testing of a Micromechanical Resonant Accelerometer.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micromechanical resonant accelerometers based on electrostatic stiffness have the advantage of it being possible to adjust their sensitivity by changing the detection voltage. However, there is a high-order nonlinear relationship between the output frequency and the induced acceleration, so it is difficult to obtain the theoretical basis to guide the microstructure design. In this study, the dynamic equation for this type of accelerometer was established under the condition of the stiffness of the folded beams being much less than that of the resonant beams. The sensitivity was obtained first, and then silicon-based microstructures were fabricated, for which metal tube-shell vacuum packaging was adopted. The two static driving capacitances were about 0.88 pF, and the detection capacitances were about 0.38 pF in the experimental test. The sensitivity was 44.5 Hz/g when the detection voltage was 1 V, while it was greater than 300 Hz/g when the detection voltage was 3 V. With an increase in the detection and driving voltages, a coupling phenomenon occurred between the vibration amplitude and frequency of the resonant beam. The double-stage folded beam failed at a high detection voltage larger than 10 V. Through the experiment, a numerical simulation model for the accelerometer was established, providing the basis for a closed-loop control circuit design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.