ArticleMicromachines2022
Anomalous Photocurrent Reversal Due to Hole Traps in AlGaN-Based Deep-Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The trap states and defects near the active region in deep-ultraviolet (DUV) light-emitting diodes (LED) were investigated through wavelength-dependent photocurrent spectroscopy. We observed anomalous photocurrent reversal and its temporal recovery in AlGaN-based DUV LEDs as the wavelength of illuminating light varied from DUV to visible. The wavelength-dependent photocurrent measurements were performed on 265 nm-emitting DUV LEDs under zero-bias conditions. Sharp near-band-edge (~265 nm) absorption was observed in addition to broad (300-800 nm) visible-range absorption peaks in the photocurrent spectrum, while the current direction of these two peaks were opposite to each other. In addition, the current direction of the photocurrent in the visible wavelength range was reversed when a certain forward bias was applied. This bias-induced current reversal displayed a slow recovery time (~6 h) when the applied forward voltage was removed. Furthermore, the recovery time showed strong temperature dependency and was faster as the sample temperature increased. This result can be consistently explained by the presence of hole traps at the electron-blocking layer and the band bending caused by piezoelectric polarization fields. The activation energy of the defect state was calculated to be 279 meV using the temperature dependency of the recovery time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.