Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014153›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2022

A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane.

Eric Lutsch, Andreas Struber, Georg Auer, Thomas Fessmann, Günter Lepperdinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric LutschSystem-Precision-on-Chip-SPOC Laboratories, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Andreas StruberSystem-Precision-on-Chip-SPOC Laboratories, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Georg AuerSystem-Precision-on-Chip-SPOC Laboratories, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas FessmannSystem-Precision-on-Chip-SPOC Laboratories, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Günter LepperdingerSystem-Precision-on-Chip-SPOC Laboratories, Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-4489
University of Salzburg · AT

Funding

Land Salzburg-Wirtschafts- und Forschungsförderung 20102-P1900166-KZP01-2019; System Precision on Chips: Fertigungsprozesse und Applikationsforschung-SPOC 2.0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in biomaterial manufacturing technologies calls for improved standards of fabrication and testing. Currently 3D-printable resins are being formulated which exhibit the potential to rapidly prototype biocompatible devices. For validation purposes, 3D-printed materials were subjected to a hierarchical validation onto the chorioallantoic membrane of the developing chicken, better known as the HET CAM assay. Working along these lines, prints made from poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEGDA), which had undergone appropriate post-print processing, outperformed other commercial resins. This material passed all tests without displaying adverse effects, as experienced with other resin types. Based on this finding, the micro bioreactors (MBR) design, first made of PDMS and that also passed with cell tests on the HET-CAM, was finally printed in PEGDA, and applied in vivo. Following this workflow shows the applicability of 3D-printable resins for biomedical device manufacturing, consents to adherence to the present standards of the 3R criteria in material research and development, and provides flexibility and fast iteration of design and test cycles for MBR adaptation and optimization.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbiocompatibilityin vivo micro bioreactorpoly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate

Identifiers

PMID36014153
PMCPMC9414255
OpenAlexW4289203582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.