Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014076›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of MALDI-TOF MS Spectra from Phylogenetically Closely Related Species

Flavia Dematheis, Mathias C Walter, Daniel Lang, Markus Antwerpen, Holger C Scholz, Marie-Theres Pfalzgraf, Enrico Mantel, Christin Hinz, Roman Wölfel, Sabine Zange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Classification ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rapid discrimination ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Flavia DematheisBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.
Mathias C WalterBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3012-2626
Daniel LangBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2166-0716
Markus AntwerpenBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-8808
Holger C ScholzRobert Koch Institut (RKI), Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Seestr. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Marie-Theres PfalzgrafBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.
Enrico MantelBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.
Christin HinzBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.
Roman WölfelBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-7821
Sabine ZangeBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-9248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) is the gold standard for microbial fingerprinting, however, for phylogenetically closely related species, the resolution power drops down to the genus level. In this study, we analyzed MALDI-TOF spectra from 44 strains of

Indexed as

B. abortusBrucella melitensisB. suisfeature selectionmachine learningMALDI-TOF MSnested k-fold cross validationR

Identifiers

PMID36014076
PMCPMC9416640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.