Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014017›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Achieving Antimicrobial Stewardship on the Global Scale: Challenges and Opportunities.

Jorge Pinto Ferreira, Daniela Battaglia, Alejandro Dorado García, KimAnh Tempelman, Carmen Bullon, Nelea Motriuc, Mark Caudell, Sarah Cahill, Junxia Song, Jeffrey LeJeune

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge Pinto FerreiraFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6281-075X
Daniela BattagliaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Alejandro Dorado GarcíaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
KimAnh TempelmanFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Carmen BullonFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1342-5484
Nelea MotriucFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Mark CaudellFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Sarah CahillFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Junxia SongFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Jeffrey LeJeuneFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 00153 Rome, Italy.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · IT

Funding

Secretariat of the Codex Alimentarius Commission thank to the generous contribution of the Republic of Korea GCP/GLO/505/ROK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been clearly identified as a major global health challenge. It is a leading cause of human deaths and also has a toll on animals, plants, and the environment. Despite the considerable socio-economic impacts, the level of awareness of the problem remains woefully inadequate, and antimicrobials are not generally recognized as a global common good, one that everyone has a role and responsibility to conserve. It is imperative for antimicrobial stewardship to be more widely implemented to achieve better control of the AMR phenomenon. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations plays an important role in promoting and facilitating antimicrobial stewardship. The specific needs to be addressed and barriers to be overcome, in particular, in low- and middle-income countries in order to implement antimicrobial stewardship practices in agrifood systems are being identified. As a global community, it is essential that we now move beyond discussing the AMR problem and focus on implementing solutions. Thus, FAO provides multi-pronged support for nations to improve antimicrobial stewardship through programs to strengthen governance, increase awareness, develop and enhance AMR surveillance, and implement best practices related to antimicrobial resistance in agrifood systems. For example, FAO is developing a platform to collect data on AMR in animals and antimicrobial use (AMU) in plants (InFARM), working on a campaign to reduce the need to use antimicrobials, studying the use of alternatives to the use of antimicrobials (especially those used for growth promotion) and actively promoting the implementation of the Codex Alimentarius AMR standards. Together, these will contribute to the control of AMR and also bring us closer to the achievement of multiple sustainable development goals.

Indexed as

animal healthantimicrobial resistance (AMR)antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)antimicrobial use (AMU)CodexFAOfood safetygovernanceInFARMlivestock productionsustainable development goals (SDGs)

Identifiers

PMID36014017
PMCPMC9412511
OpenAlexW4290720343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.