Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014001›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Microbial Biofilms at Meat-Processing Plant as Possible Places of Bacteria Survival.

Yury Nikolaev, Yulia Yushina, Andrey Mardanov, Evgeniy Gruzdev, Ekaterina Tikhonova, Galina El-Registan, Aleksey Beletskiy, Anastasia Semenova, Elena Zaiko, Dagmara Bataeva and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Prevalence of Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of the biofilm-forming ability and molecular characterization of dairyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yury NikolaevFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Yulia YushinaFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-5511
Andrey MardanovFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8245-8757
Evgeniy GruzdevFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina TikhonovaFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-9322
Galina El-RegistanFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Aleksey BeletskiyFederal Research Center "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 14, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia SemenovaV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, Talalikhina St., 26, 109316 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4372-6448
Elena ZaikoV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, Talalikhina St., 26, 109316 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5048-9321
Dagmara BataevaV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, Talalikhina St., 26, 109316 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina PolishchukV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, Talalikhina St., 26, 109316 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2719-9649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm contamination in food production threatens food quality and safety, and causes bacterial infections. Study of food biofilms (BF) is of great importance. The taxonomic composition and structural organization of five foods BF taken in different workshops of a meat-processing plant (Moscow, RF) were studied. Samples were taken from the surface of technological equipment and premises. Metagenomic analysis showed both similarities in the presented microorganisms dominating in different samples, and unique families prevailing on certain objects were noted. The bacteria found belonged to 11 phyla (no archaea). The dominant ones were

Indexed as

foodborne pathogensmeat-processingmicrobial biofilm

Identifiers

PMID36014001
PMCPMC9415349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.