ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Comparative Study for Material Selection in 3D Printing of Scoliosis Back Brace.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06785207 (Rethinking Rigidity), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rethinking Rigidity: Development of a 3D-Printed Scoliosis Brace With Varying Flexibility
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an Ergonomic Additively Manufactured Modular Saddle for Rehabilitation Cycling.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Performance of FFF-Printed Parts: A Review of Reinforcement and Modification Strategies for Thermoplastic Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dynamic Bonds Reinforced Polyamide Elastomer for Biomedical Orthosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- New Three Dimensional-Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Liners for Hip Joint Endoprostheses: A Bioactive Platform for Bone Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Open-source 3D printable forearm crutch.PloS one · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Mechanical Properties and Fragment Characteristics of a 3D-Printed Forearm Orthosis.Polymers · 2024Article
- Review
- Examining the Flexural Behavior of Thermoformed 3D-Printed Wrist-Hand Orthoses: Role of Material, Infill Density, and Wear Conditions.Polymers · 2024Article
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials-PLA and PETG-For Biomechanical Applications.Polymers · 2024Article
- Article
- An Insight into the Characteristics of 3D Printed Polymer Materials for Orthoses Applications: Experimental Study.Polymers · 2024Article
- From Virtual Reconstruction to Additive Manufacturing: Application of Advanced Technologies for the Integration of a 17th-Century Wooden Ciborium.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Spinal Braces: Evaluation of Production Process and Postural Stability in Patients with Scoliosis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, many research studies have focused on the application of 3D printing in the production of orthopaedic back braces. Several advantages, such as the ability to customise complex shapes, improved therapeutic effect and reduced production costs place this technology at the forefront in the ongoing evolution of the orthopaedic sector. In this work, four different materials, two of them poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and two of them poly(ethylene terephthalate glycol) (PETG), were characterised from a thermal, mechanical, rheological and morphological point of view. Our aim was to understand the effects of the material properties on the quality and functionality of a 3D-printed device. The specimens were cut from 3D-printed hemi-cylinders in two different orientation angles. Our results show that PETG-based samples have the best mechanical properties in terms of elastic modulus and elongation at break. The PLA-based samples demonstrated typical brittle behaviour, with elongation at break one order of magnitude lower. Impact tests demonstrated that the PETG-based samples had better properties in terms of energy absorption. Moreover, 3D-printed PETG samples demonstrated a better surface finishing with a more homogenous fibre-fibre interface. In summary, we demonstrate that the right choice of material and printing conditions are fundamental to satisfy the quality and functionality required for a scoliosis back brace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.