Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013840›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Bacterial Growth on Three Non-Resorbable Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Membranes-An In Vitro Study.

Helena Zelikman, Gil Slutzkey, Ofir Rosner, Shifra Levartovsky, Shlomo Matalon, Ilan Beitlitum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helena ZelikmanDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Gil SlutzkeyDepartment of Periodontology and Dental Implantology, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Ofir RosnerDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Shifra LevartovskyDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-9342
Shlomo MatalonDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9987-0764
Ilan BeitlitumDepartment of Periodontology and Dental Implantology, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GBR (Guided Bone Regeneration) procedure is challenged by the risk of membrane exposure to the oral cavity and contamination. The barrier quality of these membranes serve as a mechanical block from bacterial penetration into the GBR site. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of three commercial non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene membranes. (Two d-PTFE membranes and one double layer e-PTFE +d-PTFE membrane). A validated in vitro model with two bacterial species (Streptococcus sanguinis and Fusobacterium nucleatum) was used. Eight samples from membrane each were placed in a 96-well microtiter plate. The experimental and positive control groups were exposed to a bacterial suspension which involved one bacterial species in each plate. Bacterial growth was monitored spectrophotometrically at 650 nm for 24 h in temperature controlled microplate spectrophotometer under anaerobic conditions. One- Sample Kolmogorov−Smirnov Normal test and the Kruskal−Wallis test was used for the statistical analysis. As shown by the bacterial growth curves obtained from the spectrophotometer readings, all three membranes resulted in bacterial growth. We have not found a statistical difference in F. nucleatum growth between different membrane samples and the positive control group. However, S. sanguinis growth was reduced significantly in the presence of two membranes (CYTOPLAST TXT-200 and NeoGenTM) when compared to the control (p < 0.01). The presence of Permamem® had no significant influence on S. sanguinis growth. Some types of commercial non-resorbable PTFE membranes may have an impact on the growth dynamics of specific bacterial species.

Indexed as

bacterial contaminationbarrier membranesGBRmembrane exposure

Identifiers

PMID36013840
PMCPMC9414989
OpenAlexW4292246867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.