ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Combined Effect of Glass Fiber Mesh and Steel Fiber on Two-Layered Preplaced Aggregate Concrete against Drop Weight Impact.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buildings and other infrastructure should be designed to withstand impact loads in terrorist attacks or industrial catastrophes. Fibrous concrete is utilized in a variety of ways in the construction of structures to resist impact loads. Preplaced aggregate fibrous concrete (PAFC) has a different production method than traditional fibrous concrete. Although PAFC offers several benefits over standard fibers in the construction of protective structures, there are relatively few investigations on the behavior of PAFC when exposed to impact loads. This research investigated the impact response of PFAC with the combined action of steel fibers and glass fiber mesh (GFM). Twenty-two mixtures were prepared and divided into two groups in which there were fibrous and non-fibrous specimens. The specimens from the first group comprised various diameters (ratio of reinforcement surface to total sample surface) of GFM and were provided in two and four layers. The second group of specimens is the same as the first group, including a 3% dosage of steel fibers. All specimens were subjected to a drop-weight impact test and the key parameters examined were cracking and failure impact energies, ductility index and failure pattern. The results indicated that the incorporation of GFM increased the impact performance and impact ductility, where the retained impact energies and the ductility index increased by increasing the ratio of reinforcement surface (diameter) of GFM and its number of layers. However, the positive influence of SF in enhancing the impact performance was way higher than that of GFM. The use of 3% hooked-end SF improved the failure impact energy by more than 3000%, while the maximum improvement gained by using four layers of 150 mm diameter (full reinforcement surface) GFM was approximately 400%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.