Energy Channelization Analysis of Rough Tools Developed by RM-MT-EDM Process during ECSM of Glass Substrates.

Tarlochan Singh, Akshay Dvivedi, Sarabjeet Singh Sidhu, Evgeny Sergeevich Shlykov, Karim Ravilevich Muratov, Timur Rizovich Ablyaz

Abstract read

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tarlochan SinghDepartment of Product and Industrial Design, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144001, Punjab, India.

Akshay DvivediMechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India.

Sarabjeet Singh SidhuMechanical Engineering Department, Sardar Beant Singh State University, Gurdaspur 143521, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-1678

Evgeny Sergeevich ShlykovMechanical Engineering Faculty, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 614000 Perm, Russia.

Karim Ravilevich MuratovMechanical Engineering Faculty, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 614000 Perm, Russia.

Timur Rizovich AblyazMechanical Engineering Faculty, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 614000 Perm, Russia.

Funding

The reported study was supported by the Government of Perm Krai research project No С-26/644.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present work, the effect of tool surface roughness on energy channelization behavior was analyzed during the fabrication of micro holes by an electrochemical spark machining (ECSM) process. In this study, rough tools were fabricated by a rotary mode multi tip electric discharge machining (RM-MT-EDM) process. The electrical characterization was also carried out to investigate the electric field intensity over the surface of tool electrode, and it was found that the use of rough tools improves the electric field intensity by 265.54% in comparison to the smooth tool electrodes. The use of rough tools in the ECSM process forms thin and stable gas film over the tool electrode, and as a result the rough tools produced high frequency spark discharges. Energy channelization index and specific energy were considered as response characteristics. The use of rough tools improves energy channelization index by 248.40%, and the specific energy is reduced by 143.263%. The material removal mechanisms for both of the processes (RM-MT-EDM and ECSM process) have also been presented through illustrations.

Indexed as

ECSMEDMenergysurface roughnesstool electrode

Identifiers

PMID36013734

DOI10.3390/ma15165598

PMCPMC9415010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.