ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Effects of Lithium Slag on the Frost Resistance of Cement-Soil.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective Fractionation and Valorization of Lithium Refinery Residues: A Critical Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanism Study on the Influence of Clay-Type Lithium Slag on the Properties of Cement-Based Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in the Cement-Based Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mechanical Properties and Constitutive Model of the Cement-Improved Loess under Freeze-Thaw Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the effect of lithium slag (LS) on the frost resistance of cement-soil was evaluated. The results of freeze−thaw damage on the surface of the cement-soil, freeze−thaw mass loss, unconfined compression strength, triaxial shear strength, cohesion, and internal friction angle were tested at various freeze−thaw cycles after 90 days of curing when LS was incorporated into the cement-soil at different proportions (0%, 6%, 12%, and 18%). Combining nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) T2 distribution and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microscopic images, the mechanism of the effect of LS on the cement-soil was also analyzed. The experiment confirmed that the surface freeze−thaw damage degree and mass loss value of the cement-soil decreased after incorporating different LS contents, and that the unconfined compression strength, triaxial shear strength, cohesion, and internal friction angle also improved significantly compared with the specimens without LS. In this experiment, the optimization level of the cement-soil performance with different LS content was ranked as 12% > 18% > 6% > 0%. According to the NMR and SEM analysis results, the LS content of 12% can optimize the internal pore structure of the cement-soil and strengthen the bond between aggregate particles, hence inhibiting the extension of freeze-swelling cracks induced by freeze−thaw cycles. In conclusion, LS can effectively enhance the frost resistance of cement-soil, and the optimum content in this experiment is 12%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.