Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013590›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment (MIST)-A New Concept in the Treatment of Spinal Diseases: A Narrative Review.

Ken Ishii, Goichi Watanabe, Takashi Tomita, Takuya Nikaido, Tomohiro Hikata, Akira Shinohara, Masato Nakano, Takanori Saito, Kazuo Nakanishi, Tadatsugu Morimoto and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ken IshiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare (IUHW), Chiba 286-8686, Japan.
Goichi WatanabeSapporo Spine Clinic, Sapporo 060-0042, Japan.
Takashi TomitaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori 030-8553, Japan.
Takuya NikaidoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-9294
Tomohiro HikataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo 108-8642, Japan.
Akira ShinoharaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8471, Japan.
Masato NakanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Takaoka City Hospital, Takaoka 933-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5339-4515
Takanori SaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka 573-1191, Japan.
Kazuo NakanishiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Spine Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama 701-0192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-581X
Tadatsugu MorimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saga University School of Medicine, Saga 849-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3359-9684
Norihiro IsogaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare (IUHW), Chiba 286-8686, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-530X
Haruki FunaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare (IUHW), Chiba 286-8686, Japan.
Masato TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-7451
Yoshihisa KotaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka 573-1010, Japan.
Takeshi ArizonoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu Central Hospital, Fukuoka 815-0032, Japan.
Masahiro HoshinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sonoda Medical Institute Tokyo Spine Center, Tokyo 121-0807, Japan.
Koji SatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya 466-8650, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques have been developed for spinal surgery. Historically, minimizing invasiveness in decompression surgery was initially reported as a MISS technique. In recent years, MISS techniques have also been applied for spinal stabilization techniques, which were defined as minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt), including percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) fixation, lateral lumbar interbody fusion, balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, cortical bone trajectory, and cervical total disc replacement. These MISS techniques typically provide many advantages such as preservation of paraspinal musculature, less blood loss, a shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, and a lower infection rate as well as being more cost-effective compared to traditional open techniques. However, even MISS techniques are associated with several limitations including technical difficulty, training opportunities, surgical cost, equipment cost, and radiation exposure. These downsides of surgical treatments make conservative treatments more feasible option. In the future, medicine must become "minimally invasive" in the broadest sense-for all patients, conventional surgeries, medical personnel, hospital management, nursing care, and the medical economy. As a new framework for the treatment of spinal diseases, the concept of minimally invasive spinal treatment (MIST) has been proposed.

Indexed as

Spinal DiseasesSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeurosurgical ProceduresTreatment Outcomeconservative treatmentminimally invasive spinal treatment (MIST)minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt)minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS)percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)preventive medicinerehabilitationspinal instrumentation

Identifiers

PMID36013590
PMCPMC9413482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.