Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013536›Full record

SynthesisMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Markers for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hesti Platini, Eric Ferdinand, Kelvin Kohar, Stephanie Amabella Prayogo, Shakira Amirah, Maria Komariah, Sidik Maulana

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cancer risk and mortality assessment in the overweight population: evaluation of single and integrated models based on inflammatory markers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hesti PlatiniDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9088-2956
Eric FerdinandFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 40115, Indonesia.
Kelvin KoharFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 40115, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4789-0747
Stephanie Amabella PrayogoFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 40115, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0441-2868
Shakira AmirahFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 40115, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-6155
Maria KomariahDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1648-4882
Sidik MaulanaProfessional Nurse Program, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4520-1650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to a high number of mortalities. Immunotherapy, as a first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC, currently has no clarity regarding its prognostic markers to assess the treatment outcome. This systematic review aimed to evaluate neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines, starting from screening for relevant studies from several databases. Each included cohort study was further assessed by using the Newcastle−Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the available data were extracted for qualitative and quantitative synthesis in pooled and subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 1719 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) outcomes for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for NLR and PLR showed significant results, supporting NLR and PLR as prognostic markers (NLR: HR PFS 2.21 [95% CI: 1.50−3.24; p < 0.0001] and HR OS 2.68 [95% CI: 2.24−3.6; p < 0.0001]; PLR: HR PFS 1.57 [95% CI: 1.33−1.84; p < 0.00001] and HR OS 2.14 [95% CI: 1.72−2.67; p < 0.00001]). Subgroup analysis with a cut-off value of 5 for NLR and 200 for PLR also demonstrated notable outcomes. Higher NLR and PLR levels are associated with poor prognostic. Conclusions: There is considerable evidence regarding both markers as prognostic markers in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, further studies with more homogeneous baseline characteristics are required to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansImmunotherapyLymphocytesNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective Studiesadvanced non-small-cell lung cancerimmunotherapyneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratioprognostic markers

Identifiers

PMID36013536
PMCPMC9413376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.