ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022
Comparison of Anatomical Conformity between TomoFix Anatomical Plate and TomoFix Conventional Plate in Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Osteotomy Plane Violation by D-Hole Screws in Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Simulation and Comparative Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- Novel anatomically contoured locking plate shows improved anatomic conformity vs. a conventional T-shaped plate in anterior popliteus transtibial-tuberosity high tibial osteotomy: a radiologic comparison.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Are TomoFix Locking Plates Really Anatomical for Indian Population?Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The TomoFix anatomical plate was developed to improve plate position, proximal screw direction, and post-correction tibial contouring. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative configurations between the TomoFix anatomical plate and the TomoFix conventional plate. It was hypothesized that the new modified plate provides a better fixative coaptation than the conventional plate. Materials and Methods: A total of 116 cases (112 patients) were enrolled in this study from March 2015 to February 2021. Among them, 63 patients underwent surgery using the TomoFix conventional plate, and 53 underwent surgery using the TomoFix anatomical plate. The radiographic outcomes, including the hip−knee−ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), tibial slope, plate angle, proximal screw angles, and plate-to-cortex distance at #1 hole (just below the osteotomy site) were compared between the two groups. Results: Patients with the TomoFix anatomical plate showed similar results in terms of the pre- and postoperative HKA angle, MPTA, and tibial slope. The TomoFix anatomical group showed a significantly greater plate angle (39.2° ± 8.1° vs. 31.7° ± 7.0°, p < 0.001) and less screw angles, indicating that the TomoFix anatomical plates allowed a more posterior plate position than the conventional plate. The plate-to-cortex distance was significantly less in the TomoFix anatomical group than in the TomoFix conventional group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The TomoFix anatomical plate showed a more posteromedial plating position, better proximal screw direction to the lateral hinge, and improved post-correction tibial contour compared to the TomoFix conventional plate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.