Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013508›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Assessing Trifecta Achievement after Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration.

Andrea Piasentin, Francesco Claps, Tommaso Silvestri, Giacomo Rebez, Fabio Traunero, Maria Carmen Mir, Michele Rizzo, Antonio Celia, Calogero Cicero, Martina Urbani and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Impact of COVID-19 on New Kidney Cancer Diagnosis: Stage and Treatment in Northern Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea PiasentinUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6678-669X
Francesco ClapsUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-5553
Tommaso SilvestriDepartment of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Giacomo RebezUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7938-1579
Fabio TrauneroUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3272-528X
Maria Carmen MirDepartment of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain.
Michele RizzoUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Antonio CeliaDepartment of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Calogero CiceroRadiology Department, San Bassiano Hospital, ULSS 7 Pedemontana, 36061 Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Martina UrbaniRadiology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), 33081 Aviano, Italy.
Luca BalestreriRadiology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), 33081 Aviano, Italy.
Lisa PolaDepartment of Urology, ULSS 3 Serenissima, 30031 Dolo, Italy.
Fulvio LaganàDepartment of Urology, ULSS 3 Serenissima, 30031 Dolo, Italy.
Stefano CernicRadiology Department, Azienda Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Università degli Studi di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Maria Assunta CovaRadiology Department, Azienda Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Università degli Studi di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Michele BertolottoRadiology Department, Azienda Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Università degli Studi di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5583-350X
Carlo TrombettaUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0237-544X
Giovanni LiguoriUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Nicola PavanUrology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7355-7625
University of Trieste · ITOspedale San Bassiano · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation (PCA) of small renal masses (SRMs) using Trifecta outcomes in a large cohort of patients who were not eligible for surgery. Materials and methods: All PCAs performed in four different centers between September 2009 and September 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided in two different groups depending on masses dimensional criteria: Group-A: diameter ≤ 25 mm and Group-B: diameter > 25 mm. Complications rates were reported and classified according to the Clavien−Dindo system. The estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated before PCA and during follow-up schedule. Every patient received a Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) evaluation on the first postoperative day. Radiological follow-up was taken at 3, 6, and 12 months for the first year, then yearly. Radiological recurrence was defined as a contrast enhancement persistence and was reported in the study. Finally, Trifecta outcome, which included complications, RFS, and preservation of eGFR class, was calculated for every procedure at a median follow-up of 32 months. Results: The median age of the patients was 74 years. Group-A included 200 procedures while Group-B included 140. Seventy-eight patients were eligible for Trifecta evaluation. Trifecta was achieved in 69.6% of procedures in Group-A, 40.6% in Group-B (p = 0.02). We observed an increased rate of complication in Group-B (13.0% vs. 28.6; p < 0.001). However, 97.5% were <II Clavien−Dindo grade. No differences were found between the two groups regarding eGFR before and after treatment. Further, 24-months RFS rates were respectively 98.0% for Group-A and 92.1% in Group-B, while at 36 months were respectively 94.5% and 87.5% (p = 0.08). Conclusions: PCA seems to be a safe and effective treatment for SRM but in the need of more strict dimensional criteria to achieve a higher possible success rate.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryKidney NeoplasmsAgedGlomerular Filtration RateHumansNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomecryoablationrenal cancersmall renal masses

Identifiers

PMID36013508
PMCPMC9412454
OpenAlexW4289731585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.