Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013430›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Laparoscopic Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Can Visualize Anastomotic Perfusion: A Demonstration in a Porcine Model.

Aurelia Wildeboer, Wido Heeman, Arne van der Bilt, Christiaan Hoff, Joost Calon, E Christiaan Boerma, Mahdi Al-Taher, Nicole Bouvy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07720505 (COLOFLOW), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07720505 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

COLOFLOW: Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Versus Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green

TypeobservationalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsLeakage, Anastomotic, Colon Cancer, Colon Anastomosis, Colon and Rectal CancerArmsLaser Speckle Contrast Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aurelia WildeboerDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-6838
Wido HeemanUniversity Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, 8911 CE Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-1876
Arne van der BiltDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christiaan HoffDepartment of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Joost CalonZiuZ Visual Intelligence BV, 8401 DK Gorredijk, The Netherlands.
E Christiaan BoermaDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-5309
Mahdi Al-TaherDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nicole BouvyDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntestinal resection causes inevitable vascular damage, which cannot always be seen during an intraoperative clinical assessment of local intestinal perfusion. If left unaltered, impaired perfusion can lead to complications, such as anastomotic leakage (AL). Therefore, we demonstrate the use of a novel laparoscopic laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI)-based approach in order to assess local intestinal perfusion during the construction of intestinal anastomoses.

methodsThree segments were isolated from the small intestine of a pig, while the perfusion of each was compromised by coagulating 7-8 mesenteric arteries. Both clinical assessments and LSCI were used to detect the induced perfusion deficits and to subsequently guide a transection in either a well perfused, marginally perfused, or poorly perfused tissue area within the segment. Bowel ends were then utilized for the creation of three differently perfused anastomoses: well perfused/well perfused (anastomosis segment 1), well perfused/poorly perfused (anastomosis segment 2), and poorly perfused/poorly perfused (anastomosis segment 3). After construction of the anastomoses, a final perfusion assessment using both clinical assessment and LSCI was executed in order to evaluate the vascular viability of the anastomosis.

resultsLaparoscopic LSCI enabled continuous assessment of local intestinal perfusion and allowed for detection of perfusion deficits in real time. The imaging feedback precisely guided the surgical procedure, and, when evaluating the final anastomotic perfusion, LSCI was able to visualize the varying degrees of perfusion, whereas standard clinical assessment yielded only minor differences in visual appearance of the tissue.

conclusionsIn this technical note, we demonstrate a novel LSCI-based approach for intraoperative perfusion assessment. With its ability to continuously visualize perfusion in real time, laparoscopic LSCI has significant potential for the optimization of anastomotic surgery in the near future.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageimage-guided surgerylaparoscopic surgerylaser speckle contrast imagingperfusion assessmentreal-time imaging

Identifiers

PMID36013430
PMCPMC9409722
OpenAlexW4292482919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.