Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013271›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

The Evolution of a Large Biobank at Mass General Brigham.

Natalie T Boutin, Samantha B Schecter, Emma F Perez, Natasha S Tchamitchian, Xander R Cerretani, Vivian S Gainer, Matthew S Lebo, Lisa M Mahanta, Elizabeth W Karlson, Jordan W Smoller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inherited Susceptibility to Urinary Tract Infections from Kidney Papilla to Bladder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Systematic common and rare variant association testing in 392,030 whole genomes inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalie T BoutinMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Samantha B SchecterMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Emma F PerezBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Natasha S TchamitchianMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Xander R CerretaniMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Vivian S GainerMass General Brigham Research Information Science & Computing, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Matthew S LeboMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Lisa M MahantaMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Elizabeth W KarlsonMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jordan W SmollerMass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Center for Common Disease GeneticsUM1HG008895 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI DALY, MARK JOSEPH, GABRIEL, STACEY · 2016 to 2020
$111.2M
Finding Genomic Profiles of COVID-19 Phenotypes from the EHRU01HG008685 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIZABETH W KARLSON, Matthew S Lebo · 2015 to 2026
$13.6M
Joint Biology Consortium Resource-based CenterP30AR070253 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Peter A Nigrovic, Jeffrey Andrew Sparks · 2016 to 2026
$9.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008685NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG008895NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mass General Brigham Biobank (formerly Partners HealthCare Biobank) is a large repository of biospecimens and data linked to extensive electronic health record data and survey data. Its objective is to support and enable translational research focused on genomic, environmental, biomarker and family history associations with disease phenotypes. The Biobank has enrolled more than 135,000 participants, generated genomic data on more than 65,000 of its participants, distributed approximately 153,000 biospecimens, and served close to 450 institutional studies with biospecimens or data. Although the Biobank has been successful, based on some measures of output, this has required substantial institutional investment. In addition, several challenges are ongoing, including: (1) developing a sustainable cost model that doesn't rely as heavily on institutional funding; (2) integrating Biobank operations into clinical workflows; and (3) building a research resource that is diverse and promotes equity in research. Here, we describe the evolution of the Biobank and highlight key lessons learned that may inform other efforts to build biobanking efforts in health system contexts.

Indexed as

biobankbiorepositoryMass General Brigham Biobankpersonalized medicineprecision medicineresearch operationstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID36013271
PMCPMC9410531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.