ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
The Role of the Pharmacist in Selecting the Best Choice of Medication Formulation in Dysphagic Patients.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Pharmacists in Tackling Mpox: Challenges and Future Prospects: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Home-based collaborative management of bullous pemphigoid with delayed seropositive conversion of anti-BP180-NC16a antibody.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of clinical pharmacist interventions on medication administration via enteral feeding tubes in a neurology ward: a pre- and post-educational prospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Hospital Variation in Feeding Jejunostomy Policy for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Nutrients · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Usually, the administration of drugs by feeding tube in dysphagic patients involves handling of marketing licenses outside their term, due to the lack of suitable formulations. This circumstance has put health professionals in the dilemma of choosing the formulation whose manipulation possibly does not alter the effectiveness of the drug. In this regard, a practical guide providing indications on the prescription, handling, and administration of drugs through enteral feeding tube could be of paramount utility. For this purpose, we have considered the 1047 solid oral pharmaceutical forms included in the formulary of San Paolo Hospital (Savona, Italy). From our analysis, it emerges that 95% of medicinal products are worryingly used off-label and 40% have to be managed by the hospital pharmacists without having suitable indications by either the manufacturers or by literature studies. To fill this gap, we have compiled a detailed table containing missing indications derived from pharmacist expertise and evidence-based practices, with the aim that the sharing of our procedures will contribute to make uniform pharmacological therapies from one hospital to another. This study will allow doctors to have easy access to information on drugs that can be prescribed and nurses to become familiar only with the pharmaceutical forms that can be administered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.