Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013227›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Contribution of Synthetic Data Generation towards an Improved Patient Stratification in Palliative Care.

Waldemar Hahn, Katharina Schütte, Kristian Schultz, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Martin Sedlmayr, Ulrich Schuler, Martin Eichler, Saptarshi Bej, Markus Wolfien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fully personalized modelling of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy ambulation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Waldemar HahnInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Katharina SchütteUniversity Palliative Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Kristian SchultzDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Universitätsplatz 1, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Olaf WolkenhauerDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Universitätsplatz 1, 18051 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-2937
Martin SedlmayrInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Ulrich SchulerUniversity Palliative Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1337-7045
Martin EichlerNational Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9654-2207
Saptarshi BejDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Universitätsplatz 1, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Markus WolfienInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1887-4772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI model development for synthetic data generation to improve Machine Learning (ML) methodologies is an integral part of research in Computer Science and is currently being transferred to related medical fields, such as Systems Medicine and Medical Informatics. In general, the idea of personalized decision-making support based on patient data has driven the motivation of researchers in the medical domain for more than a decade, but the overall sparsity and scarcity of data are still major limitations. This is in contrast to currently applied technology that allows us to generate and analyze patient data in diverse forms, such as tabular data on health records, medical images, genomics data, or even audio and video. One solution arising to overcome these data limitations in relation to medical records is the synthetic generation of tabular data based on real world data. Consequently, ML-assisted decision-support can be interpreted more conveniently, using more relevant patient data at hand. At a methodological level, several state-of-the-art ML algorithms generate and derive decisions from such data. However, there remain key issues that hinder a broad practical implementation in real-life clinical settings. In this review, we will give for the first time insights towards current perspectives and potential impacts of using synthetic data generation in palliative care screening because it is a challenging prime example of highly individualized, sparsely available patient information. Taken together, the reader will obtain initial starting points and suitable solutions relevant for generating and using synthetic data for ML-based screenings in palliative care and beyond.

Indexed as

GANspalliative carepersonalized medicinescreeningsynthetic data generation

Identifiers

PMID36013227
PMCPMC9409663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.