Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013128›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Impact of Probiotics and Prebiotics on Dry Eye Disease Signs and Symptoms.

Azadeh Tavakoli, Maria Markoulli, Eric Papas, Judith Flanagan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Probiotic Development Strategy Centered on Stability and Regulatory Considerations.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of gut microbiomes in different ocular pathologies: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Oral Intake ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  16. Microbiome-based therapeutics for ocular diseases.Clinical & experimental optometry · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Azadeh TavakoliBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Maria MarkoulliSchool of Optometry, Vision Science University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Eric PapasSchool of Optometry, Vision Science University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Judith FlanaganSchool of Optometry, Vision Science University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Australian College of Optometry · AUBrien Holden Vision Institute · AUVision Cooperative Research Centre · AU

Funding

Brien Holden Vision Institute The study was conducted as part of a postgraduate education grant supported by the Brien Holden Vision Institute.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye is considered an inflammatory disease. Gut microbiota are important in the regulation of low-grade chronic inflammation, including in the eye. Probiotics and prebiotics are increasingly used to regulate chronic-disease-associated gut dysbiosis. Therefore, this double-masked, randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to explore the potential of oral probiotics and prebiotics in the management of dry eye disease. In total, 41 participants with dry eye received probiotic and prebiotic supplements (treatment group, n = 23) or respective placebos (control group, n = 18) for 4 months. Dry eye symptoms and signs were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Dry Eye Questionnaire 5, osmolarity, non-invasive keratograph break-up time (NIKBUT), ocular surface staining, tear meniscus height (TMH), lipid layer thickness, and conjunctival redness. After 4 months, the average OSDI score of the treatment group was significantly better compared to that of the controls (16.8 ± 5.9 vs. 23.4 ± 7.4; p < 0.001). The NIKBUT and TMH did not change significantly with treatment (p = 0.31 and p = 0.84) but reduced significantly for controls on average by −5.5 ± 1.0 secs (p = 0.03) and 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (p = 0.02). These data suggest that probiotics and prebiotics might be effective in the management of dry eye disease.

Indexed as

clinical researchdry eye diseaseeye symptomsprebioticprobiotictreatment

Identifiers

PMID36013128
PMCPMC9409742
OpenAlexW4292566891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.