Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013092›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Predicting Renal Denervation Response in Resistant High Blood Pressure by Arterial Stiffness Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Alexandru Burlacu, Crischentian Brinza, Mariana Floria, Anca Elena Stefan, Andreea Covic, Adrian Covic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. An Update on the Role of Renal Artery Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandru BurlacuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-1588
Crischentian BrinzaFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-3203
Mariana FloriaFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9465-1503
Anca Elena StefanFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Andreea CovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Adrian CovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurately selecting hypertensive candidates for renal denervation (RDN) therapy is required, as one-third of patients who undergo RDN are non-responders. We aimed to systematically review the literature on RDN response prediction using arterial stiffness assessment, optimizing the selection of patients referred for interventional blood pressure lowering procedures. Methods: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to retrieve potential eligible studies from the inception to 30 June 2022. Results: Ten studies were finally included in this systematic review. Studies consistently documented that invasive pulse wave velocity (PWV) was correlated with RDN’s significant success. Nevertheless, non-invasive ambulatory arterial stiffness index and PWV derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were independent predictors of blood pressure response (p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001). In some studies, magnetic resonance imaging parameters of arterial stiffness (ascending aortic distensibility, total arterial compliance) were correlated with blood pressure reduction (AUC = 0.828, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Assessing arterial stiffness prior to RDN predicted procedural success, since stiffness parameters were strongly correlated with a significant blood pressure response. Our endeavor should be tackled as a step forward in selecting appropriate hypertensive patients scheduled for RDN therapy. Non-invasive measurements could be an alternative to invasive parameters for response prediction.

Indexed as

non-responderspredictionrenal denervationresistant arterial hypertensionresponders

Identifiers

PMID36013092
PMCPMC9410368
OpenAlexW4292246796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.