Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36013048›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Overload: A Systematic Review Focusing on Occlusal Analysis through Digital and Analogic Methods.

Adolfo Di Fiore, Mattia Montagner, Stefano Sivolella, Edoardo Stellini, Burak Yilmaz, Giulia Brunello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Under pressure: Unraveling the impact of occlusal overload on peri-implant health-A systematic review.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Initial exploration of the relationship between homeostatic occlusion and long-term dental implant stability].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adolfo Di FioreDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-2567
Mattia MontagnerPrivate Practice, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9803-1806
Stefano SivolellaDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1916-1640
Edoardo StelliniDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Burak YilmazDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7101-363X
Giulia BrunelloDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-0085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review aimed to assess the possible relationship between occlusal overload and peri-implant bone loss. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1985 up to and including December 2021. The search strategy applied was: (dental OR oral) AND implants AND (overload OR excessive load OR occlusal wear) AND (bone loss OR peri-implantitis OR failure). Clinical studies that reported quantitative analysis of occlusal loads through digital contacts and/or occlusal wear were included. The studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. In total, 492 studies were identified in the search during the initial screening. Of those, 84 were subjected to full-text evaluation, and 7 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (4 cohort studies, 2 cross-sectional, and 1 case-control). Only one study used a digital device to assess excessive occlusal forces. Four out of seven studies reported a positive correlation between the overload and the crestal bone loss. All of the included studies had moderate to serious overall risk of bias, according to the ROBINS-I tool. In conclusion, the reported data relating the occlusal analysis to the peri-implant bone level seem to reveal an association, which must be further investigated using new digital tools that can help to standardize the methodology.

Indexed as

complicationsdental implantimplant-supported restorationsmarginal bone lossocclusionoverloading

Identifiers

PMID36013048
PMCPMC9409652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.