ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Comparison of the 2013 and 2019 Nationwide Surveys on the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease by General Practitioners in Japan.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges and strategies for managing early-to-moderate chronic kidney disease in primary care: A systematic integrative review in high-income countries.The European journal of general practice · 2026Pooled it
- Nationwide questionnaire analysis on awareness of general practitioners for the management of chronic kidney disease in Japan.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- The diagnostic status of chronic kidney disease in a real-world database in Japan: CHECK-CKD.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Observational
- Obstacles and Opportunities for Albuminuria Testing On the Basis of the Perspective of Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2019, the Japan Physicians Association conducted a second nationwide survey on the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among the Japanese general practitioners (GPs). We aimed to clarify the changes in the state of CKD medical care by GPs since the 2013 survey. The 2013 and 2019 surveys included 2214 and 601 GPs, respectively, who voluntarily participated. The two surveys were compared, using propensity score matching to balance the background of the responded GPs. For the medical care of CKD, the frequency of urine or blood examination, use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value for CKD management, and continuous use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for their reno-protective effects were significantly higher in 2019 than in 2013 (all: p < 0.001). The medical cooperation in CKD management, the utilization of the clinical path for CKD management and the measurement of the eGFR during the medical health checkup were significantly increased in 2019, compared to those in 2013. More GPs felt dissatisfied with the components of CKD treatment by nephrologists (p < 0.001). The two surveys confirmed improvements in the level of medical care for CKD and a strengthening in cooperation. However, the dissatisfaction with the consultation with nephrologists did not necessarily improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.