Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36012978›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Custom Bone Regeneration (CBR): An Alternative Method of Bone Augmentation-A Case Series Study.

Daniele De Santis, Luciano Umberto, Donadello Dario, Faccioni Paolo, Morris Zarantonello, Cristian Alberti, Giuseppe Verlato, Federico Gelpi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bone Regeneration: Overview and Future Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniele De SantisHead and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Luciano UmbertoHead and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Donadello DarioHead and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Faccioni PaoloHead and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Morris ZarantonelloHead and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Cristian AlbertiFree Practitioner, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Giuseppe VerlatoDepartment of Diagnostics, Public Health University of Verona, 36100 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5262-8818
Federico GelpiHead and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2226-9476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR MATERIALS AND

methodsNine patients presenting 10 bone defects were referred to solve oral dysfunction due to edentulous atrophic ridges. Guided bone regeneration was performed with titanium meshes combined with autogenous bone grafting and heterologous bovine bone mineral grafting, and exclusively a "poncho technique" soft tissue approach for all the cases. After a mean 9 months of graft healing (range 6-12 months), titanium meshes were removed, and implant surgery was subsequently performed. The results we obtained were positive in terms of volumetric increases in height, length and thickness of the atrophic ridges without biological complications detectable before implant surgery.

resultsOut of nine, one site met titanium mesh exposure: however, in all 10 sites a three-dimensional volumetric bone implementation was obtained. The statistical results were estimated by uploading and superimposing cbct scans before and after CBR surgery for each patient, so it was possible evaluate the maximum linear vertical and horizontal bone gain through dedicated Cad Cam software (Exocad GmbH

conclusionsThe results we obtained in this study suggest that this CBR procedure (Yxoss

Indexed as

bone defectcustom bone regenerationdigital flowdigital planning in surgerysuperimposition

Identifiers

PMID36012978
PMCPMC9409981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.