Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36012885›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

First Experience and Prospective Evaluation on Feasibility and Acute Toxicity of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy of the Prostate Bed as Salvage Treatment in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer on a 1.5T MR-Linac.

Daniel Wegener, Alexandra Thome, Frank Paulsen, Cihan Gani, Jessica Boldt, Sarah Butzer, Daniela Thorwarth, David Moennich, Marcel Nachbar, Arndt-Christian Müller and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04172753 (Feasibility of Imaging and Radiotherapy on a Novel 1.5 T Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Linear Accelerator System), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04172753 narecruitingnot on this map

Feasibility of Imaging and Radiotherapy on a Novel 1.5 T Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Linear Accelerator System (MR-Linac)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2018 to 2027Enrolled472ConditionsRectal Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Liver Cancer, Breast CancerArmsRadiotherapy on the MR-Linac, Imaging on the MR Linac
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel WegenerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0012-6589
Alexandra ThomeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Frank PaulsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-528X
Cihan GaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0242-9428
Jessica BoldtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Sarah ButzerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Daniela ThorwarthSection for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-9315
David MoennichSection for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Marcel NachbarSection for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-4740
Arndt-Christian MüllerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Daniel ZipsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Simon BoekeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3210-3368
University of Tübingen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEKlinikum Ludwigsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNovel MRI-linear accelerator hybrids (MR-Linacs, MRL) promise an optimization of radiotherapy (RT) through daily MRI imaging with enhanced soft tissue contrast and plan adaptation on the anatomy of the day. These features might potentially improve salvage RT of prostate cancer (SRT), where the clinical target volume is confined by the mobile organs at risk (OAR) rectum and bladder. So far, no data exist about the feasibility of the MRL technology for SRT. In this study, we prospectively examined patients treated with SRT on a 1.5 T MRL and report on workflow, feasibility and acute toxicity. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixteen patients were prospectively enrolled within the MRL-01 study (NCT: NCT04172753). All patients were staged and had an indication for SRT after radical prostatectomy according to national guidelines. RT consisted of 66 Gy in 33 fractions or 66.5/70 Gy in 35 fractions in case of a defined high-risk region. On the 1.5 T MRL, daily plan adaption was performed using one of two workflows: adapt to shape (ATS, using contour adaptation and replanning) or adapt to position (ATP, rigid replanning onto the online anatomy with virtual couch shift). Duration of treatment steps, choice of workflow and treatment failure were recorded for each fraction of each patient. Patient-reported questionnaires about patient comfort were evaluated as well as extensive reporting of acute toxicity (patient reported and clinician scored).

resultsA total of 524/554 (94.6%) of fractions were successfully treated on the MRL. No patient-sided treatment failures occurred. In total, ATP was chosen in 45.7% and ATS in 54.3% of fractions. In eight cases, ATP was performed on top of the initial ATS workflow. Mean (range) duration of all fractions (on-table time until end of treatment) was 25.1 (17.6-44.8) minutes. Mean duration of the ATP workflow was 20.60 (17.6-25.2) minutes and of the ATS workflow 31.3 (28.2-34.1) minutes. Patient-reported treatment experience questionnaires revealed high rates of tolerability of the treatment procedure. Acute toxicity (RTOG, CTC as well as patient-reported CTC, IPSS and ICIQ) during RT and 3 months after was mild to moderate with a tendency of recovery to baseline levels at 3 months post RT. No G3+ toxicity was scored for any item.

conclusionsIn this first report on SRT of prostate cancer patients on a 1.5 T MRL, we could demonstrate the feasibility of both available workflows. Daily MR-guided adaptive SRT of mean 25.1 min per fraction was well tolerated in this pretreated collective, and we report low rates of acute toxicity for this treatment. This study suggests that SRT on a 1.5 T MRL can be performed in clinical routine and it serves as a benchmark for future analyses.

Indexed as

adaptive RTMR-guided RTMR-Linacpostoperative RT of prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36012885
PMCPMC9410121
OpenAlexW4293516796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.