Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36012417›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Diagnostic Potential of Circulating Tumor Cells, Urinary MicroRNA, and Urinary Cell-Free DNA for Bladder Cancer: A Review.

Dai Koguchi, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Izuru Shiba, Takahiro Harano, Satoshi Okuda, Kohei Mori, Shuhei Hirano, Kazuki Kitajima, Masaomi Ikeda, Masatsugu Iwamura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic potential of urinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of Nanoformulations in the Treatment of Lung Cancer.Recent patents on nanotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Epigenetic and Immunological Features of Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dai KoguchiDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8057-8221
Kazumasa MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Izuru ShibaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahiro HaranoDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Satoshi OkudaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kohei MoriDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shuhei HiranoDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazuki KitajimaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masaomi IkedaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masatsugu IwamuraDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Sagamihara 252-0374, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of primary bladder cancer (BCa) is vital, because stage and grade have been generally accepted not only as categorical but also as prognostic factors in patients with BCa. The widely accepted screening methods for BCa, cystoscopy and urine cytology, have unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy, with high rates of false negatives, especially for flat-type BCa with cystoscopy and for low-risk disease with urine cytology. Currently, liquid biopsy has attracted much attention as being compensatory for that limited diagnostic power. In this review, we survey the literature on liquid biopsy for the detection of BCa, focusing on circulating tumor cells (CTCs), urinary cell-free DNA (ucfDNA), and urinary microRNA (umiRNA). In diagnostic terms, CTCs and umiRNA are determined by quantitative analysis, and ucfDNA relies on finding genetic and epigenetic changes. The ideal biomarkers should be highly sensitive in detecting BCa. Currently, CTCs produce an unfavorable result; however, umiRNA and ucfDNA, especially when analyzed using a panel of genes, produce promising results. However, given the small cohort size in most studies, no conclusions can yet be drawn about liquid biopsy's immediate application to clinical practice. Further large studies to validate the diagnostic value of liquid biopsy for clinical use are mandatory.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsMicroRNAsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsMicroRNAsbladder cancercell-free DNAcirculating tumor cellsmicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID36012417
PMCPMC9409245
OpenAlexW4292074241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.