Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36012184›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Human Umbilical Cord Lining-Derived Epithelial Cells: A Potential Source of Non-Native Epithelial Cells That Accelerate Healing in a Porcine Cutaneous Wound Model.

Jonah Ee Hsiang Kua, Chun Wei Siow, Wee Keng Lim, Jeyakumar Masilamani, Monica Suryana Tjin, Joe Yeong, Tony Kiat Hon Lim, Toan Thang Phan, Alvin Wen Choong Chua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Recent Approaches for Wound Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonah Ee Hsiang KuaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Chun Wei SiowSkin Bank Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-5239
Wee Keng LimSkin Bank Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Jeyakumar MasilamaniCellResearch Corporation Pte. Ltd., 137 Market Street, Grace Global Raffles #08-02, Singapore 048943, Singapore.
Monica Suryana TjinProgramme in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Joe YeongInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 61 Biopolis, Proteos, Singapore 138673, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-7153
Tony Kiat Hon LimDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Toan Thang PhanCellResearch Corporation Pte. Ltd., 137 Market Street, Grace Global Raffles #08-02, Singapore 048943, Singapore.
Alvin Wen Choong ChuaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-9695
Singapore General Hospital · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

National Medical Research Council NMRC/CNIG/1106/2013National Medical Research Council OFIRG20nov-0024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human umbilical cord lining epithelial cells [CLECs) are naïve in nature and can be ethically recovered from cords that are routinely discarded. The success of using oral mucosal epithelial cells for cornea defects hints at the feasibility of treating cutaneous wounds using non-native CLECs. Herein, we characterized CLECs using flow cytometry (FC) and skin organotypic cultures in direct comparison with skin keratinocytes (KCs). This was followed by wound healing study to compare the effects of CLEC application and the traditional use of human skin allografts (HSGs) in a porcine wound model. While CLECs were found to express all the epidermal cell markers probed, the major difference between CLECs and KCs lies in the level of expression (in FC analysis) as well as in the location of expression (of the epithelium in organotypic cultures) of some of the basal cell markers probed. On the pig wounds, CLEC application promoted accelerated healing with no adverse reaction compared to HSG use. Though CLECs, like HSGs, elicited high levels of local and systemic immune responses in the animals during the first week, these effects were tapered off more quickly in the CLEC-treated group. Overall, the in vivo porcine data point to the potential of CLECs as a non-native and safe source of cells to treat cutaneous wounds.

Indexed as

Umbilical CordWound HealingAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansKeratinocytesSkinSwineCLECscord lining epithelial cellscutaneous woundsskin keratinocytesumbilical cordwound healing

Identifiers

PMID36012184
PMCPMC9408523
OpenAlexW4293780027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.