Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36012033›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Application of an EMG-Rehabilitation Robot in Patients with Post-Coronavirus Fatigue Syndrome (COVID-19)-A Feasibility Study.

Ewa Zasadzka, Sławomir Tobis, Tomasz Trzmiel, Renata Marchewka, Dominika Kozak, Anna Roksela, Anna Pieczyńska, Katarzyna Hojan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rehabilitation and COVID-19: systematic review by Cochrane Rehabilitation.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa ZasadzkaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-8202
Sławomir TobisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-3258
Tomasz TrzmielDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-3494
Renata MarchewkaNeurorehabilitation Ward, Greater Poland Provincial Hospital, 60-480 Poznan, Poland.
Dominika KozakDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Health Science, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Anna RokselaEgzotech sp. z o.o., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-4586
Anna PieczyńskaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-7118
Katarzyna HojanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-9424
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of an EMG-driven rehabilitation robot in patients with Post-Viral Fatigue (PVF) syndrome after COVID-19. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups (IG-intervention group and CG-control group) in an inpatient neurological rehabilitation unit. Both groups were assessed on admission and after six weeks of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation was carried out six days a week for six weeks. The patients in the IG performed additional training using an EMG rehabilitation robot. Muscle fatigue was assessed using an EMG rehabilitation robot; secondary outcomes were changes in hand grip strength, Fatigue Assessment Scale, and functional assessment scales (Functional Independence Measure, Barthel Index). Both groups improved in terms of the majority of measured parameters comparing pre- and post-intervention results, except muscle fatigue. Muscle fatigue scores presented non-significant improvement in the IG and non-significant deterioration in the CG. Using an EMG rehabilitation robot in patients with PVF can be feasible and safe. To ascertain the effectiveness of such interventions, more studies are needed, particularly involving a larger sample and also assessing the participants' cognitive performance.

Indexed as

FatiguePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRoboticsFeasibility StudiesHand StrengthHumansPilot Projectsexerciseshand grip strengthoccupational therapyphysiotherapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36012033
PMCPMC9407702
OpenAlexW4293679762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.