Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011970›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Global Healthcare Needs Related to COVID-19: An Evidence Map of the First Year of the Pandemic.

Mariana Aparicio Betancourt, Andrea Duarte-Díaz, Helena Vall-Roqué, Laura Seils, Carola Orrego, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Jaime Barrio-Cortes, María Teresa Beca-Martínez, Almudena Molina Serrano, Carlos Jesús Bermejo-Caja and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariana Aparicio BetancourtAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5114-4168
Andrea Duarte-DíazCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-9945
Helena Vall-RoquéAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain.
Laura SeilsAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain.
Carola OrregoAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain.
Lilisbeth Perestelo-PérezNetwork for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-7313
Jaime Barrio-CortesInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2582-0203
María Teresa Beca-MartínezServicio de Medicina Preventiva del Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, 45004 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9915-7750
Almudena Molina SerranoHermanas Hospitalarias, 28939 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Jesús Bermejo-CajaUnidad de Apoyo Técnico Dirección Técnica de Sistemas de información, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28035 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1425-6691
Ana Isabel González-GonzálezNetwork for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1707-0596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed gaps and areas of need in health systems worldwide. This work aims to map the evidence on COVID-19-related healthcare needs of adult patients, their family members, and the professionals involved in their care during the first year of the pandemic. We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full texts for eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Descriptive data were extracted and inductive qualitative content analysis was used to generate codes and derive overarching themes. Thirty-six studies met inclusion criteria, with the majority reporting needs from the perspective of professionals (35/36). Professionals' needs were grouped into three main clusters (basic, occupational, and psycho-socio-emotional needs); patients' needs into four (basic, healthcare, psycho-socio-emotional, and other support needs); and family members' needs into two (psycho-socio-emotional and communication needs). Transversal needs across subgroups were also identified and grouped into three main clusters (public safety, information and communication, and coordination and support needs). This evidence map provides valuable insight on COVID-19-related healthcare needs. More research is needed to assess first-person perspectives of patients and their families, examine whether needs differ by country or region, and evaluate how needs have evolved over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultDelivery of Health CareFamilyHealth FacilitiesHumansCOVID-19evidence mapfamily members’ needshealthcare needshealthcare professionals’ needsneeds assessmentpandemicpatients’ needssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36011970
PMCPMC9408445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.