Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011794›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evaluation of Root Anatomy and Canal Configuration of Human Permanent Maxillary First Molar Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review.

Sourabh Barbhai, Rajesh Shetty, Poonam Joshi, Vini Mehta, Ankita Mathur, Tanvi Sharma, Damini Chakraborty, Priyanka Porwal, Aida Meto, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sourabh BarbhaiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India.
Rajesh ShettyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India.
Poonam JoshiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India.
Vini MehtaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune 411018, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-907X
Ankita MathurSTAT SENSE, Srushti 10, Sector 1 D, Amba Township Pvt. Ltd., Trimandir, Adalaj 382421, Gujarat, India.
Tanvi SharmaSTAT SENSE, Srushti 10, Sector 1 D, Amba Township Pvt. Ltd., Trimandir, Adalaj 382421, Gujarat, India.
Damini ChakrabortyBhowal's Dental and Implant Clinic, Bengal GreenField Heights, Galaxy-6FS, beside Apollo Pharmacy, DJ Block (Newtown), Newtown, Kolkata 700136, West Bengal, India.
Priyanka PorwalSTAT SENSE, Srushti 10, Sector 1 D, Amba Township Pvt. Ltd., Trimandir, Adalaj 382421, Gujarat, India.
Aida MetoDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Aldent, 1007 Tirana, Albania.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-2194
Dian Agustin WahjuningrumDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlingga, Surabaya 60132, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5168-1016
Alexander Maniangat LukeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-5885-7694
Ajinkya M PawarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai 400008, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3985-5674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review the literature on root canal configuration (RCC) and the frequency of occurrence of a second mesiobuccal canal (MB) in human permanent maxillary first molars where cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used. Online electronic databases such as PubMed-Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched using appropriate keywords from the earliest available date until 12th June 2022, without restriction on language. In the mesiobuccal root, type I was the most frequent (33.29%), followed by types II and IV (27.18% and 26.36%, respectively). Moreover, 68.2% of maxillary first molars had a second MB canal. For both the distobuccal and palatal roots, type I was the most prevalent, with 99.08% and 97.83% occurrence, respectively. All other types were infrequent. Type I RCC is most frequent in all the roots of the maxillary first molars. Hence, care must be taken during biomechanical preparation of the MB roots.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMolarTooth Rootcanal configurationCBCTpermanent mandibular first molarroot canalVertucci classification

Identifiers

PMID36011794
PMCPMC9408299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.