ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Supporting and Enabling the Process of Innovation in Public Health: The Framework for Public Health Innovation.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A multi-level community-based systems dynamic approach to advance equitable adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Chicago.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An Innovative Youth-Friendly Electronic Questionnaire to Identify Mental, Sexual and Reproductive Health Risks: A Validation Study of the Total Teen Assessment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Narrowing the health equity gap. How can implementation science proactively facilitate the cultural adaptation of public health innovations?Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Review
- Patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: high tech, low yield?Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Partnering With Youth to Enhance Healthcare Access and Experience: Lessons Learned From a Teen Advisory Group.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Mapping the global research landscape and trends of autoimmune encephalitis: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Polio Eradication in Pakistan: Innovation and Digitalization-the Key to Crossing the Finish Line.Public health reviews · 2024Article
- Addressing Evaluation Barriers with Early Innovation Development for Adolescent-Focused Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Article
- Reflections on public health innovations: Progress and challenges for ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This manuscript introduces a new framework for creating innovations in public health-the Framework for Public Health Innovation. The framework was developed through a longitudinal qualitative research study that investigated the process of creating innovative adolescent health programs. Interviews were conducted with a national sample of 26 organizations over two time points. Data collection focused on the process of innovative program development; organizational capacity; training; and technical assistance needs, successes, and barriers. The framework was developed and modified based on interview findings and expert advice; then, the final framework was validated with content experts. The framework illustrates a dynamic process of innovation that begins with dissatisfaction with the status quo, and then, illustrates three necessary components for innovation-space, process, and partnerships. Four categories of innovation, which range in complexity, are proposed: (1) creating a new component to an existing program, (2) adapting an existing program to meet new needs, (3) taking an alternative approach to addressing an existing program, and (4) reframing a health problem from a new perspective. As illustrated by a feedback loop, the resulting innovations disrupt the status quo. This model can be applied to any content area in public health and is useful for both research and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.