Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011716›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians' Working Hours and Earnings in São Paulo and Maranhão States, Brazil.

Bruno Luciano Carneiro Alves de Oliveira, Lucas Salvador Andrietta, Regimarina Soares Reis, Ruth Helena de Souza Britto Ferreira de Carvalho, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto E Alves, Mário César Scheffer, Giuliano Russo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno Luciano Carneiro Alves de OliveiraProgram in Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8053-7972
Lucas Salvador AndriettaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13416-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5848-611X
Regimarina Soares ReisJoaquim Venâncio Polytechnic School of Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Ruth Helena de Souza Britto Ferreira de CarvalhoProgram in Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.
Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto E AlvesProgram in Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4806-7752
Mário César SchefferDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13416-000, Brazil.
Giuliano RussoWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-369X
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R022747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence exists on the health impacts of the current COVID-19 pandemic on health workers, but less is known about its impact on their work dynamics and livelihoods. This matters, as health workers-and physicians in particular-are a scarce and expensive resource in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our cross-sectional survey set out to explore changes in working hours and earnings during the second year of the pandemic in a representative sample of 1183 physicians in Brazil's São Paulo (SP) and Maranhão (MA) states. Descriptive analysis and inferential statistics were employed to explore differences in working hours and earnings among public and private sector physicians across the two locations. The workloads and earnings of doctors working exclusively in the public sector increased the most in the second year of the epidemic, particularly in MA. Conversely, the largest proportion of private-only doctors in our sample saw a decrease in their working hours (48.4%, 95% CI 41.8-55.0), whereas the largest proportion of public-only doctors in MA saw an increase in their working hours (44.4%, 95% CI 38.0-50.8). Although earnings remained broadly stable in the public sector, a third of public sector-only physicians in MA saw an increase in their earnings (95% CI 24.4-36.2). More than half of private-only doctors across both states saw a decrease in their earnings (52.2%, 95% CI 45.6-58.8). The largest proportion of dual practitioners (the majority in Brazil and in our sample) maintained their pre-pandemic levels of income (38.8%, 95% CI 35.3-42.3). As public-sector doctors have been key in the fight against the pandemic, it is critical to invest in these cadres in order to develop epidemic preparedness in LMICs, and to find new ways to harness for-profit actors to deliver social benefits.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsCOVID-19health labor markethealth systemhealth workers in Brazilhealth workforce in LMICsphysician health

Identifiers

PMID36011716
PMCPMC9408582
OpenAlexW4292056135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.