Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011699›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Improving Toilet Usability and Cleanliness in Public Schools in the Philippines Using a Packaged Operation and Maintenance Intervention.

Denise Duijster, Bella Monse, Marvin Marquez, Ubo Pakes, Nicole Stauf, Habib Benzian

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Denise DuijsterDepartment of Oral Public Health, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bella MonseRegional Fit for School Programme, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), 10th Floor, Bank of Makati Building, Ayala Avenue Extension near Corner Metropolitan Avenue, Makati City 1209, Philippines.
Marvin MarquezPopulation Institute, College of Social Science and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines.
Ubo PakesCenter for Environmental Informatics, University of the Philippines Cebu, Gorordo Avenue, Cebu City 6000, Philippines.
Nicole StaufThe Health Bureau Ltd., Whiteleaf Business Center, 11 Little Balmer, Buckingham MK18 1TF, UK.
Habib BenzianWHO Collaborating Center Quality Improvement & Evidence-Based Dentistry, Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10010, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-4849
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit · PHNew York University · USUniversity of the Philippines Cebu · PHUniversity of the Philippines Diliman · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of packaged interventions for operation and maintenance (O&M) on the usability and cleanliness of toilets in public schools in the Philippines. In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, the divisions of Roxas City and Passi City were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Schools in Roxas City (n = 14) implemented the packaged O&M interventions; schools in Passi City (n = 16) formed the control group. Outcome variables were toilet usability-defined as accessible, functional and private-and toilet cleanliness, measured using the Sanitation Assessment Tool (SAT) and the Cleaner Toilets, Brighter Future (CTBF) instruments at baseline and at four months follow-up through direct observation of school toilets. SAT results showed that intervention schools had a 32.0% (4.6%; 59.3%) higher percentage of usable toilets than control schools at follow-up after full adjustment (

Indexed as

Bathroom EquipmentHumansPhilippinesSanitationSchoolsToilet Facilitiescleanlinessoperation and maintenancesanitationschoolstoiletsWater, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)

Identifiers

PMID36011699
PMCPMC9407854
OpenAlexW4292068986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.