Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011514›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Raising the Child-Do Screen Media Help or Hinder? The Quality over Quantity Hypothesis.

Diana Puzio, Iwona Makowska, Krystyna Rymarczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diana PuzioDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0870-1632
Iwona MakowskaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-6343
Krystyna RymarczykDepartment of Biological Psychology, University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw, 03-815 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4085-9480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screen media are ubiquitous in human life across all age, cultural and socioeconomic groups. The ceaseless and dynamic growth of technological possibilities has given rise to questions regarding their effect on the well-being of children. Research in this area largely consists of cross-sectional studies; experimental and randomized studies are rare, which makes drawing causative conclusions difficult. However, the prevailing approach towards the use of screen media by children has focused on time limitations. The emerging evidence supports a more nuanced perspective. It appears that the older the child, the more important how the screen media are used becomes. Concentrating on the quality of the screen, time has become increasingly relevant in the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitated a transfer of educational and social functioning from real-life to the digital world. With this review, we aimed at gathering current knowledge on the correlations of different screen media use and development outcomes, as well as providing an overview of potential benefits that new technologies may provide to the pediatric population. To summarize, if one cannot evade screen time in children, how can we use it for children's maximum advantage?

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyHumansScreen Timechildrendevelopmentdigital healthscreen time

Identifiers

PMID36011514
PMCPMC9408637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.