ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Brazilian Strategy for Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Promotion: A Program Impact Pathway Analysis.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated With the Continuation of Breastfeeding Beyond 12 Months of Age in Brazilian Families.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Article
- Article
- Blueprint for Enhancing Implementation Quality ofGlobal implementation research and applications · 2025Article
- Decolonizing mental health: Rethinking implementation science from the ground up.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Patterns of complementary feeding introduction and associated factors in a cohort of Brazilian infants.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Breastfeeding, first-food systems and corporate power: a case study on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry in Brazil.Globalization and health · 2024Article
- Determining RE-AIM indicators for evaluating the Estratégia Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil (EAAB - Brazilian Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Strategy).Revista de saude publica · 2024Article
- Nutrition transition in Brazilian children under 5 years old from 2006 to 2019.Cadernos de saude publica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Brazilian Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Strategy (Estratégia Amamenta e Alimenta Brasil-EAAB) aims to improve Primary Health Care (PHC) workers' counseling skills to promote and support infant and young children feeding (IYCF). However, the maintenance and scaling up of the EAAB has been challenging. The theory-driven Program Impact Pathway (PIP) is recommended to assess and enhance the large-scale implementation of IYCF programs. The purpose of this study was to document barriers and facilitators to scale up the EAAB using a PIP analysis.
methodsFirst, we reviewed EAAB documents to develop an initial PIP diagram. Then, we interviewed EAAB key informants to identify Critical Quality Control Points (CCP) in the PIP. We revised and analyzed the PIP to inform the EAAB core functions and pathways.
resultsSix CCPs for EAAB maintenance were identified: CCP1-Definition and strengthening of the coordination in states and municipalities; CCP2-Maintenance of tutors' work; CCP3-Feasibility of the certification process; CCP 4-Quality improvement of IYCF activities in PHC units; CCP 5-Adequate use of monitoring systems; and CCP 6-Consistent implementation monitoring. Four implementation pathways and seven core functions identified may assist with scaling up the EAAB in Brazil.
conclusionThe PIP analysis proved to be useful for documenting the factors that influence the maintenance and scaling up of the EAAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.