Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011412›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Adherence to Carbohydrate Counting Improved Diet Quality of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus during Social Distancing Due to COVID-19.

Gabriela Correia Uliana, Manuela Maria De Lima Carvalhal, Talita Nogueira Berino, Aline Leão Reis, Karem Miléo Felício, João Soares Felício, Daniela Lopes Gomes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Value of carbohydrate counting.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriela Correia UlianaPostgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7042-8254
Manuela Maria De Lima CarvalhalFaculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Talita Nogueira BerinoPostgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2603-9387
Aline Leão ReisPostgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Karem Miléo FelícioPostgraduate Program in Attention and Clinical Study in Diabetes, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
João Soares FelícioPostgraduate Program in Attention and Clinical Study in Diabetes, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Daniela Lopes GomesPostgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0092-3396
Universidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To control glycemic variability in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), it is essential to perform carbohydrate counting (CC), a strategy that ensures better quality of life for these patients. Thus, this study aims to analyze potential factors associated with adherence to CC in adults with T1DM during social distancing due to COVID-19 in Brazil. This was a single cross-sectional study carried out in July 2020. An online form was used to collect sociodemographic and economic data on the purchasing of supplies and food, as well as social distancing. The Chi-square test was performed with adjusted residuals analysis and a binomial logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05). Of 472 adults, 37.71% reported performing CC in the same frequency as before social distancing. There was an association between performance of CC and the type of city (p = 0.027), family income (p = 0.000), use of financial emergency aid (p = 0.045), type of insulin administration and glycemic monitoring (p < 0.000), and cooking more (p = 0.012). Participants who maintained or reduced consumption of ultra-processed foods were 0.62 times more likely to adhere to CC (OR 0.626, 95% IC: 0.419−0.935) and participants who cooked more were 1.67 times more likely to adhere to CC (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.146−2.447). There are still people with T1DM who did not know about and did not use CC method, which highlights the need for diabetes education.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultBlood GlucoseCross-Sectional StudiesDietHumansPhysical DistancingQuality of LifeBlood GlucosecarbohydratesCOVID-19diabetes mellitussocial distancing

Identifiers

PMID36011412
PMCPMC9408385
OpenAlexW4290760358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.