ArticleGenes2022
Evaluation of the Impact of the Peregrine Falcon (
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to determine the impact of increased demand for peregrine falcons via breeding (mainly Polish, Czech, German and Slovak) on the genetic structure of the birds. In the analysis, 374 specimens from six countries were sampled in 2008-2019 (omitting 2009), and all the birds analyzed were released into the wild as part of the Polish reintroduction program. The assessment of genetic variation was based on a well-known panel of 10 microsatellite markers described for the species. We calculated a fixation index for the samples from each year, and based on this, we determined the level of inbreeding. We also performed an analysis using the Bayesian cluster method, assuming that 1-19 hypothetical populations would define the division that best fit the samples. The most probable division was into two groups; in the first group, the samples from individuals delivered in 2013 were most often segregated; moreover, in this year, a jump in inbreeding, expressed by the fixation index, was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.