Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011388›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Development of SLAF-Sequence and Multiplex SNaPshot Panels for Population Genetic Diversity Analysis and Construction of DNA Fingerprints for Sugarcane.

Hui Zhang, Pingping Lin, Yanming Liu, Chaohua Huang, Guoqiang Huang, Hongtao Jiang, Liangnian Xu, Muqing Zhang, Zuhu Deng, Xinwang Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of a Sugarcane (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Pingping LinNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Yanming LiuNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Chaohua HuangNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Guoqiang HuangNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Hongtao JiangNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Liangnian XuNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Muqing ZhangGuangxi Key Laboratory for Sugarcane Biology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3138-3422
Zuhu DengNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Xinwang ZhaoNational Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic, Breeding Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNGuangxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A genetic diversity analysis and identification of plant germplasms and varieties are important and necessary for plant breeding. Deoxyribonucleotide (DNA) fingerprints based on genomic molecular markers play an important role in accurate germplasm identification. In this study, Specific-Locus Amplified Fragment Sequencing (SLAF-seq) was conducted for a sugarcane population with 103 cultivated and wild accessions. In total, 105,325 genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called successfully to analyze population components and genetic diversity. The genetic diversity of the population was complex and clustered into two major subpopulations. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed that these accessions could not be completely classified based on geographical origin. After filtration, screening, and comparison, 192 uniformly-distributed SNP loci were selected for the 32 chromosomes of sugarcane. An SNP complex genotyping detection system was established using the SNaPshot typing method and used for the precise genotyping and identification of 180 sugarcane germplasm samples. According to the stability and polymorphism of the SNPs, 32 high-quality SNP markers were obtained and successfully used to construct the first SNP fingerprinting and quick response codes (QR codes) for sugarcane. The results provide new insights for genotyping, classifying, and identifying germplasm and resources for sugarcane breeding.

Indexed as

SaccharumDNA FingerprintingGenetics, PopulationPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA fingerprintinggenetic diversitySNPsugarcanevariety identification

Identifiers

PMID36011388
PMCPMC9408448
OpenAlexW4293679419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.