Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011385›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Cytogenetic Analysis in the Toad Species

Katerina Guzmán-Markevich, Álvaro S Roco, Adrián Ruiz-García, Mónica Bullejos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Comparative cytogenetics of theComparative cytogenetics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katerina Guzmán-MarkevichDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas S/N, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Álvaro S RocoDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas S/N, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-3939
Adrián Ruiz-GarcíaDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas S/N, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6773-5066
Mónica BullejosDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas S/N, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3256-8840
Universidad de Jaén · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxonomy in Bufonidae witnessed notable transformations. Bufotes viridis and Epidalea calamita, previously included in genus Bufo, were relocated in other genera, while the genus Bufo was restricted to members of the earlier Bufo bufo group. On the other hand, Bufo bufo sensu lato now includes four species: Bufo bufo, Bufo spinosus, Bufo verrucosissimus and Bufo eichwaldi. In this study, we examined three species of three Bufonidae genera (B. spinosus, B. viridis and E. calamita) by conventional (C-banding and Ag-NOR staining) and molecular (in situ hybridization with probes for telomeric repeats and rDNA loci, and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)) cytogenetic methods. C-banding patterns are reported for the first time for B. spinosus and E. calamita populations from Iberian Peninsula and for B. viridis from Greece, and reveal several differences with the reported C-banded karyotypes described for other European populations of these species. Silver staining shows size heteromorphisms of the signals at the Nucleolar Organizing Region (NOR). By contrast, FISH with ribosomal probes only reveal size heteromorphism of rDNA sequences in E. calamita, suggesting that the differences observed after silver staining in B. spinosus and B. viridis should be attributed to differences in chromosomal condensation and/or gene activity rather than to differences in the copy number for ribosomal genes. Regarding telomeric repeats, E. calamita is the only species with interstitial telomeric sequences (ITS) located on centromeric regions, probably originated by accumulation of telomeric sequences in the centromeric heterochromatin. Finally, we analyzed the composition and distribution of repetitive sequences by genome in situ hybridization. These experiments reveal the accumulation of repetitive sequences in centromeric regions of the three species, although these sequences are not conserved when species from different genera are compared.

Indexed as

BufonidaeTelomereAnimalsCytogenetic AnalysisDNA, RibosomalKaryotypingDNA, RibosomalamphibianbufonidaeC-bandingchromosome evolutionFISHgenomic in situ hybridization (GISH)interstitial telomeric sequences (ITS)nucleolar organizing region (NOR)rDNA

Identifiers

PMID36011385
PMCPMC9408106
OpenAlexW4292247418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.