ArticleGenes2022
Expression and Genetic Effects of GLI Pathogenesis-Related 1 Gene on Backfat Thickness in Pigs.
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genes and Gene Functions Associated with Morphological, Productive, Reproductive, and Carcass Quality Traits in Pigs: A Functional Bioinformatics Approach.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backfat thickness (BFT) is an important carcass composition trait and regarded as a breeding focus. Our initial transcriptome analysis of pig BFT identified GLI pathogenesis-related 1 (GLIPR1) as one of the promising candidate genes. This study was conducted to identify the expression profiles, polymorphisms, and genetic effects of the GLIPR1 gene on BFT in pigs. The expression of the GLIPR1 gene existed in every detected tissue, and there was a significantly higher expression in spleen and adipose tissue than others (p < 0.05). At the different ages of pig, the expression of the GLIPR1 gene was low at an early age, increased with growth, and reached the highest level at 180 days. Genetic polymorphism analysis was detected in 553 individuals of the Large White × Minzhu F2 population. Four SNPs in the promoter significantly associated with 6−7 rib BFT (p < 0.05) were predicted to alter the transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), and the mutations of g.38758089 T>G and g.38758114 G>C were predicted to change the TFs associated with the regulation of adipogenesis. Haplotypes were formed by the detected SNPs, and one block showed a strong association with BFT (p < 0.05). In summary, our results indicate that the expression profiles and genetic variants of GLIPR1 affected the BFT of pigs. To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate the biological function and genetic effects of the GLIPR1 gene on the BFT of pig and provide genetic markers to optimize breeding for BFT in pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.