Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011335›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Identification of New Copy Number Variation and the Evaluation of a CNV Detection Tool for NGS Panel Data in Polish Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients.

Lena Rutkowska, Iwona Pinkier, Kinga Sałacińska, Łukasz Kępczyński, Dominik Salachna, Joanna Lewek, Maciej Banach, Paweł Matusik, Ewa Starostecka, Andrzej Lewiński and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Calling and Phasing of Single-Nucleotide and Structural Variants of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lena RutkowskaDepartment of Genetics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2120-9842
Iwona PinkierDepartment of Genetics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Kinga SałacińskaDepartment of Genetics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Łukasz KępczyńskiDepartment of Genetics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-5448
Dominik SalachnaDepartment of Genetics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Joanna LewekDepartment of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Maciej BanachDepartment of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-6874
Paweł MatusikDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Obesity and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-7051
Ewa StarosteckaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Andrzej LewińskiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-3337
Rafał PłoskiDepartment of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6286-5526
Piotr StawińskiDepartment of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka GachDepartment of Genetics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland.
Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited, autosomal dominant metabolic disorder mostly associated with disease-causing variant in LDLR, APOB or PCSK9. Although the dominant changes are small-scale missense, frameshift and splicing variants, approximately 10% of molecularly defined FH cases are due to copy number variations (CNVs). The first-line strategy is to identify possible pathogenic SNVs (single nucleotide variants) using multiple PCR, Sanger sequencing, or with more comprehensive approaches, such as NGS (next-generation sequencing), WES (whole-exome sequencing) or WGS (whole-genome sequencing). The gold standard for CNV detection in genetic diagnostics are MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent amplification) or aCGH (array-based comparative genome hybridization). However, faster and simpler analyses are needed. Therefore, it has been proposed that NGS data can be searched to analyze CNV variants. The aim of the study was to identify novel CNV changes in FH patients without detected pathogenic SNVs using targeted sequencing and evaluation of CNV calling tool (DECoN) working on gene panel NGS data; the study also assesses its suitability as a screening step in genetic diagnostics. A group of 136 adult and child patients were recruited for the present study. The inclusion criteria comprised at least “possible FH” according to the Simon Broome diagnostic criteria in children and the DLCN (Dutch Lipid Clinical Network) criteria in adults. NGS analysis revealed potentially pathogenic SNVs in 57 patients. Thirty selected patients without a positive finding from NGS were subjected to MLPA analysis; ten of these revealed possibly pathogenic CNVs. Nine patients were found to harbor exons 4−8 duplication, two harbored exons 6−8 deletion and one demonstrated exon 9−10 deletion in LDLR. To test the DECoN program, the whole study group was referred for bioinformatic analysis. The DECoN program detected duplication of exons 4−8 in the LDLR gene in two patients, whose genetic analysis was stopped after the NGS step. The integration of the two methods proved to be particularly valuable in a five-year-old girl presenting with extreme hypercholesterolemia, with both a pathogenic missense variant (c.1747C>T) and exons 9−10 deletion in LDLR. This is the first report of a heterozygous deletion of exons 9 and 10 co-occurring with SNV. Our results suggest that the NGS-based approach has the potential to identify large-scale variation in the LDLR gene and could be further applied to extend CNV screening in other FH-related genes. Nevertheless, the outcomes from the bioinformatic approach still need to be confirmed by MLPA; hence, the latter remains the reference method for assessing CNV in FH patients.

Indexed as

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type IIProprotein Convertase 9AdultChildChild, PreschoolDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansPolandReceptors, LDLPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9Receptors, LDLbioinformatic toolcopy number variation (CNV)DECoNfamilial hypercholesterolemiagenetic basisinherited disorderLDLR genemultiplex ligation-dependent amplification (MLPA)panel next generation sequencing (NGS)phenotype-genotype correlation

Identifiers

PMID36011335
PMCPMC9407502
OpenAlexW4291001748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.