Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011269›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Physicochemical, Nutritional Properties and Metabolomics Analysis Fat Deposition Mechanism of Chahua Chicken No. 2 and Yao Chicken.

Yong Liu, Shuangmin Liang, Kun Wang, Xiannian Zi, Ru Zhang, Guangzheng Wang, Jiajia Kang, Zijian Li, Tengfei Dou, Changrong Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Functional identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5872-2231
Shuangmin LiangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2946-7515
Kun WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Xiannian ZiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Ru ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Guangzheng WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Jiajia KangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Zijian LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Tengfei DouCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Changrong GeCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China.
Yunnan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry is an important dietary source of animal protein, accounting for approximately 30% of global meat consumption. Because of its low price, low fat and cholesterol content, and no religious restrictions, chicken is considered a widely available healthy meat. Chahua chicken No. 2 is a synthetic breed of Chahua chicken derived from five generations of specialized strain breeding. In this study, Chahua chicken No. 2 (CH) and Yao chicken (Y) were used as the research objects to compare the differences in physicochemical and nutritional indicators of meat quality between the two chicken breeds, and metabolomics was used to analyze the differences in metabolites and lipid metabolism pathways and to explore the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis. The physical index and nutritional value of CH are better than that of Y, and the chemical index of Y is better than that of CH. However, the chemical index results of CH are also within the normal theoretical value range. Comprehensive comparison shows that the meat quality of CH is relatively good. Metabolomics analysis showed that CH and Y had 85 different metabolites, and the differential metabolites were mainly classified into eight categories. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed 13 different metabolic pathways. The screened

Indexed as

ChickensMeatAdipogenesisAnimalsFatty AcidsMusclesPoultryFatty Acidschickenfat depositionmeat quality characteristicsmetabonomics

Identifiers

PMID36011269
PMCPMC9407069
OpenAlexW4288431669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.