Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011141›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Current Concept of Quantitative Sensory Testing and Pressure Pain Threshold in Neck/Shoulder and Low Back Pain.

Hidenori Suzuki, Shu Tahara, Mao Mitsuda, Hironori Izumi, Satoshi Ikeda, Kazushige Seki, Norihiro Nishida, Masahiro Funaba, Yasuaki Imajo, Kiminori Yukata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hidenori SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-0591
Shu TaharaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Mao MitsudaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Hironori IzumiPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Satoshi IkedaPain Management Research Institute, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Kazushige SekiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Norihiro NishidaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-6579
Masahiro FunabaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Yasuaki ImajoDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Kiminori YukataDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Takashi SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JP

Funding

MHLW FG Program Grant JPMH22FG2001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, several published articles have shown that quantitative sensory testing (QST) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) are useful in the analysis of neck/shoulder and low back pain. A valid reference for normal PPT values might be helpful for the clinical diagnosis of abnormal tenderness or muscle pain. However, there have been no reliable references for PPT values of neck/shoulder and back pain because the data vary depending on the devices used, the measurement units, and the area examined. In this article, we review previously published PPT articles on neck/shoulder and low back pain, discuss the measurement properties of PPT, and summarize the current data on PPT values in patients with chronic pain and healthy volunteers. We also reveal previous issues related to PPT evaluation and discuss the future of PPT assessment for widespread use in general clinics. We outline QST and PPT measurements and what kinds of perceptions can be quantified with the PPT. Ninety-seven articles were selected in the present review, in which we focused on the normative values and abnormal values in volunteers/patients with neck/shoulder and low back pain. We conducted our search of articles using PubMed and Medline, a medical database. We used a combination of "Pressure pain threshold" and "Neck shoulder pain" or "Back pain" as search terms and searched articles from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2022. From the data extracted, we revealed the PPT values in healthy control subjects and patients with neck/shoulder and low back pain. This database could serve as a benchmark for future research with pressure algometers for the wide use of PPT assessment in clinics.

Indexed as

low back painmusculoskeletal painneck/shoulder painpressure pain thresholdquantitative sensory testingreference value

Identifiers

PMID36011141
PMCPMC9408781
OpenAlexW4290600514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.