Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011105›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Internet-Related Instruments (Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale, Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form, and Nomophobia Questionnaire) and Their Associations with Distress among Malaysian University Students.

Serene En Hui Tung, Wan Ying Gan, Jung-Sheng Chen, Kamolthip Ruckwongpatr, Iqbal Pramukti, Siti R Nadhiroh, Yen-Ling Chang, Chien-Chin Lin, Amir H Pakpour, Chung-Ying Lin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nomophobia (No Mobile Phone Phobia) and Psychological Health Issues among Young Adult Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Serene En Hui TungDivision of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9122-7523
Wan Ying GanDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9016-3414
Jung-Sheng ChenDepartment of Medical Research, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3187-9479
Kamolthip RuckwongpatrInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.
Iqbal PramuktiDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-0534
Siti R NadhirohDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-6094
Yen-Ling ChangDepartment of Family Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei 23148, Taiwan.
Chien-Chin LinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan.
Amir H PakpourDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, SE-551 11 Jönköping, Sweden.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2129-4242
Mark D GriffithsInternational Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-6524

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 110-2410-H-006-115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of four instruments related to internet use, namely the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS), (nine-item) Internet Gaming Disorder Scale Short Form (IGDS9-SF), and Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMPQ) as well as their associations with psychological distress among Malaysian university students. A total of 380 Malaysian university students (71.6% females, mean age 24.0 years) were recruited through convenience sampling and completed an online survey including questions concerning socio-demographic background, social media addiction, smartphone addiction, internet gaming disorder, and nomophobia. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were applied to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments and Cronbach's alpha value and McDonald's omega value were used to confirm the internal consistency reliability of the instruments. The unidimensional structure was confirmed for the BSMAS, SABAS, and IGDS9-SF while the four-factor structure was confirmed for NMPQ. All instruments showed good internal consistency reliability. Promising validity and reliability were confirmed for BSMAS, SABAS, IGDS9-SF, and NMPQ. Therefore, they are useful to assess different types of problematic internet use among university students in Malaysia. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between internet use and psychological distress. The present study is the first to investigate the validity and reliability of BSMAS, SABAS, IGDS9-SF, and NMPQ among Malaysian university students using rigorous psychometric testing methods (i.e., Rasch analysis).

Indexed as

problematic internet usepsychometricsRasch analysissmartphone addictionsocial media addictionuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID36011105
PMCPMC9408412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.