ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Doctors' Preferences in the Selection of Patients in Online Medical Consultations: An Empirical Study with Doctor-Patient Consultation Data.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The status and challenges of online consultation service in internet hospitals operated by physical hospitals in China: a large-scale pooled analysis of multicenter data.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- What Key Factors Affect Patient Satisfaction on Online Medical Consultation Platforms? A Case Study from China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of online medical services by older adults: a modified UTAUT2 based study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Online Medical Team Engagement on Patient Satisfaction: A Semantic Features Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Who is Facing Higher Increased Demand After the Online-Offline Channel Integration? Evidence from Public Hospitals in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Online medical consultation (OMC) allows doctors and patients to communicate with each other in an online synchronous or asynchronous setting. Unlike face-to-face consultations in which doctors are only passively chosen by patients with appointments, doctors engaging in voluntary online consultation have the option of choosing patients they hope to treat when faced with a large number of online questions from patients. It is necessary to characterize doctors' preferences for patient selection in OMC, which can contribute to their more active participation in OMC services. We proposed to exploit a bipartite graph to describe the doctor-patient interaction and use an exponential random graph model (ERGM) to analyze the doctors' preferences for patient selection. A total of 1404 doctor-patient consultation data retrieved from an online medical platform in China were used for empirical analysis. It was found that first, mildly ill patients will be prioritized by doctors, but the doctors with more professional experience may be more likely to prefer more severely ill patients. Second, doctors appear to be more willing to provide consultation services to patients from urban areas, but the doctors with more professional experience or from higher-quality hospitals give higher priority to patients from rural and medically underserved areas. Finally, doctors generally prefer asynchronous communication methods such as picture/text consultation, while the doctors with more professional experience may be more willing to communicate with patients via synchronous communication methods, such as voice consultation or video consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.