Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011034›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool for Data Analysis and Prognosis in Cancer Patients: Results from the Clarify Study.

María Torrente, Pedro A Sousa, Roberto Hernández, Mariola Blanco, Virginia Calvo, Ana Collazo, Gracinda R Guerreiro, Beatriz Núñez, Joao Pimentao, Juan Cristóbal Sánchez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology: methodological bases, practical applications and ethical and regulatory issues.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

María TorrenteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8791-7660
Pedro A SousaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2825-149 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3814-6331
Roberto HernándezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Mariola BlancoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Virginia CalvoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3503-4847
Ana CollazoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Gracinda R GuerreiroDepartment of Mathematics and CMA, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2825-149 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4805-2638
Beatriz NúñezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Joao PimentaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2825-149 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6011-008X
Juan Cristóbal SánchezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Manuel CamposChronobiology Lab, Department of Physiology, College of Biology, Mare Nostrum Campus, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-3769
Luca CostabelloAccenture Labs, D02 P820 Dublin, Ireland.
Vit NovacekData Science Institute, NUI Galway, H91 A06C Galway, Ireland.
Ernestina MenasalvasCentro Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5615-6798
María Esther VidalTIB Leibniz-Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
Mariano ProvencioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-7919
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTAccenture (Ireland) · IEInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IETechnische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) · DEUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

European Union Horizon H2020 programme 875160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has contributed substantially in recent years to the resolution of different biomedical problems, including cancer. However, AI tools with significant and widespread impact in oncology remain scarce. The goal of this study is to present an AI-based solution tool for cancer patients data analysis that assists clinicians in identifying the clinical factors associated with poor prognosis, relapse and survival, and to develop a prognostic model that stratifies patients by risk. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used clinical data from 5275 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma at Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda. Accessible clinical parameters measured with a wearable device and quality of life questionnaires data were also collected.

resultsUsing an AI-tool, data from 5275 cancer patients were analyzed, integrating clinical data, questionnaires data, and data collected from wearable devices. Descriptive analyses were performed in order to explore the patients' characteristics, survival probabilities were calculated, and a prognostic model identified low and high-risk profile patients.

conclusionOverall, the reconstruction of the population's risk profile for the cancer-specific predictive model was achieved and proved useful in clinical practice using artificial intelligence. It has potential application in clinical settings to improve risk stratification, early detection, and surveillance management of cancer patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer patientsdata integrationdecision support systempatient stratificationprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID36011034
PMCPMC9406336
OpenAlexW4292560523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.