Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011013›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

ADC Values of Cytologically Benign and Cytologically Malignant 18 F-FDG PET-Positive Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Petra K de Koekkoek-Doll, Sander Roberti, Laura Smit, Wouter V Vogel, Regina Beets-Tan, Michiel W van den Brekel, Jonas Castelijns

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Petra K de Koekkoek-DollDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9370-6026
Sander RobertiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura SmitDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1325-4790
Wouter V VogelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Regina Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel W van den BrekelDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-6743
Jonas CastelijnsDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-4023
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nodal staging (N-staging) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is essential for treatment planning and prognosis. 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has high performance for N-staging, although the distinction between cytologically malignant and reactive PET-positive nodes, and consequently, the selection of nodes for ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USgFNAC), is challenging. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) can help to detect nodal metastases. We aim to investigate the potential of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a metric to distinguish between cytologically reactive and malignant PET-positive nodes in order to improve node selection criteria for USgFNAC. PET-CT, real-time image-fused USgFNAC and DW-MRI to calculate ADC were available for 78 patients offered for routine N-staging. For 167 FDG-positive nodes, differences in the ADC between cytologically benign and malignant PET-positive nodes were evaluated, and both were compared to the ADC values of PET-negative reference nodes. Analyses were also performed in subsets of nodes regarding HPV status. A mild negative correlation between SUVmax and ADC was found. No significant differences in ADC values were observed between cytologically malignant and benign PET-positive nodes overall. Within the subset of non-HPV-related nodes, ADC

Indexed as

DW-MRIFDG-PEThead and neck oncologylymph nodereal-time image fusion

Identifiers

PMID36011013
PMCPMC9406365
OpenAlexW4292548081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.